<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Let&#8217;s talk about the economics of great journalism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ratcliffeblog.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1679" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ratcliffeblog.com/?p=1679</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 12:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: What&#8217;s missing from the debate over paying for the news &#171; Ink-Drained Kvetch</title>
		<link>http://ratcliffeblog.com/?p=1679#comment-1515</link>
		<dc:creator>What&#8217;s missing from the debate over paying for the news &#171; Ink-Drained Kvetch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 18:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ratcliffeblog.com/?p=1679#comment-1515</guid>
		<description>[...] A few journalist-centric views &#8212; and they are rare &#8212; are here and here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A few journalist-centric views &#8212; and they are rare &#8212; are here and here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unrequired Reading {20.1.09 to&#160;21.1.09}</title>
		<link>http://ratcliffeblog.com/?p=1679#comment-1501</link>
		<dc:creator>Unrequired Reading {20.1.09 to&#160;21.1.09}</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ratcliffeblog.com/?p=1679#comment-1501</guid>
		<description>[...] Let&#8217;s talk about the economics of great journalism &#124; RatcliffeBlog - Having been in and around journalism, citizen journalism and publishing for a long time, let me suggest we stop talking about the ethics of providing complete and useful information to citizens of a democracy, which are barely changed by the requirements of social media and cloud computing technology, in isolation from the economics of journalism. If someone delivers great journalism on a regular basis, what does it cost to do it? What is it worth to you to get better news coverage of an important issue? Let&#8217;s posit that if the journalism is &#8220;great&#8221; or even &#8220;good,&#8221; it will be ethical, and face the problem of paying for the change we&#160;want. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Let&rsquo;s talk about the economics of great journalism | RatcliffeBlog - Having been in and around journalism, citizen journalism and publishing for a long time, let me suggest we stop talking about the ethics of providing complete and useful information to citizens of a democracy, which are barely changed by the requirements of social media and cloud computing technology, in isolation from the economics of journalism. If someone delivers great journalism on a regular basis, what does it cost to do it? What is it worth to you to get better news coverage of an important issue? Let&rsquo;s posit that if the journalism is &ldquo;great&rdquo; or even &ldquo;good,&rdquo; it will be ethical, and face the problem of paying for the change we&nbsp;want. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
